Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 17;116(28):13780–13784. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1819744116

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Self-similarity of the neck profile. (A) The evolution of the bubble neck profile in time (data corresponding to d=750μm, μ=1.4Pa.s, and Ca=0.008); blue and green symbols represent the data corresponding to the early and late-time self-similar regimes, and red symbols represent the transition between the two. (B) Scaling the neck profile with the minimum neck diameter collapses the data corresponding to the early-time self-similar regime, where R~(ξ)=r~(z~,τ~)/τ~1/5 and ξ=(z~z~0)/τ~1/5. The dashed line, overlaying the blue symbols corresponding to the early-time self-similar regime, represents the self-similar solution of the long-wave model (SI Appendix, section 2). The data corresponding to the late-time self-similar regime, however, deviate from the predictions of the long-wave model. (C) The definition of parameters used to characterize the bubble neck profile. (D) The evolution of the axial length scale defined as ζ~=r~0r~c versus time to pinch-off. In the early-time regime, ζ~=r~cr~0τ~1/5, consistent with the predictions of the long-wave model. In the late-time regime, however, r~0τ~ and ζ~τ~1/2, which indicates that the axial radius of curvature becomes constant, i.e., the neck profile becomes a parabola that simply translates in time (13, 42). (E) Scaling the axial length scale with the expressions obtained in D leads to the collapse of all bubble neck profiles during the entire pinch-off process (shown in A) onto a single parabolic curve: r/r0=1+[(zz0)/ζ]2 (dashed line).