Table 3. Association between dietary patterns during pregnancy with overweight and obesity. Ribeirão Preto, state of São Paulo, 2011–2012a. (n = 754).
| Variable | 1st tercile | 2nd tercile | 3rd tercile | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
| OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | ||
| Traditional Brazilian pattern | |||||
|
| |||||
| Overweight | |||||
| Adjusted modelb | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.56–1.29 | 1.06 | 0.70–1.60 |
| Obesity | |||||
| Adjusted modelb | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.45–1.08 | 0.61 | 0.38–0.96 |
|
| |||||
| Snacks pattern | |||||
|
| |||||
| Overweight | |||||
| Adjusted modelb | 1.00 | 1.55 | 1.01–2.36 | 1.40 | 0.92–2.15 |
| Obesity | |||||
| Adjusted modelb | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.56–1.38 | 0.86 | 0.55–1.35 |
|
| |||||
| Coffee pattern | |||||
|
| |||||
| Overweight | |||||
| Adjusted modelb | 1.00 | 1.25 | 0.83–1.89 | 1.13 | 0.75–1.72 |
| Obesity | |||||
| Adjusted modelb | 1.00 | 1.27 | 0.81–2.00 | 1.12 | 0.71–1.76 |
|
| |||||
| Healthy pattern | |||||
|
| |||||
| Overweight | |||||
| Adjusted modelb | 1.00 | 1.13 | 0.74–1.71 | 0.84 | 0.55–1.29 |
| Obesity | |||||
| Adjusted modelb | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.57–1.38 | 0.52 | 0.33–0.83 |
a Multinomial logistic regression models, considering eutrophic models as reference.
b Multinomial logistic regression models adjusted for age, gestational week at the time of interview, schooling (years of study), smoking (never smoked, interrupted during gestation, and currently smokes), physical activity practice (minutes/week of walking for locomotion or physical exercise) and number of children.