Table 4. Relationship between dietary patterns during gestation and gestational diabetes mellitus. Ribeirão Preto, state of São Paulo, 2011–2012a. (n = 785).
| Variable | 1st tercile | 2nd tercile | 3rd tercile | p trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | |||
| Traditional Brazilian pattern | ||||
| Model 1b | 1.00 | 0.64 (0.41–1.02) | 0.62 (0.39–0.99) | 0.04 |
| Model 2c | 1.00 | 0.66 (0.41–1.05) | 0.64 (0.39–1.04) | 0.06 |
| Snacks pattern | ||||
| Model 1b | 1.00 | 1.06 (0.67–1.69) | 1.01 (0.63–1.63) | 0.95 |
| Model 2c | 1.00 | 1.00 (0.63–1.61) | 0.96 (0.59–1.55) | 0.88 |
| Coffee pattern | ||||
| Model 1b | 1.00 | 1.01 (0.63–1.63) | 0.97 (0.60–1.58) | 0.91 |
| Model 2c | 1.00 | 1.00 (0.63–1.63) | 0.97 (0.59–1.59) | 0.92 |
| Healthy pattern | ||||
| Model 1b | 1.00 | 0.92 (0.57–1.48) | 0.97 (0.61–1.56) | 0.91 |
| Model 2c | 1.00 | 0.91 (0.57–1.47) | 1.04 (0.64–1.68) | 0.87 |
a Non-conditional logistic regression models, considering normoglycemic women as reference.
b Model 1 was adjusted for: age (years), gestational week at the time of the interview, previous GDM (yes/no), schooling (years of study), family history of DM (yes/no), smoking (never smoked, interrupted during gestation, or currently smokes), physical activity (minutes/week of walking or exercise) and number of children.
c Model 2: Additional adjustment for maternal excessive body weight (yes/no).