Table 1.
Salmonella control measures applied | Current controla | Reduced control |
---|---|---|
CONTROL AT IMPORT OF FEED AND FEED MATERIALS | ||
Official control measures | Yes | No (0%) |
Self-monitoring, sampling | Yes | Reduced (50–90%) |
Quarantine storage for high-risk feed | Yes | No (0%) |
Eradication of Salmonella when detected | Yes | No (0%) |
CONTROL AT COMMERCIAL FEED MANUFACTURING | ||
Treatment of feed, labor and materialsb | Yes | Reduced (95%) |
Maintaining appropriate hygiene | Yes | Yes (100%) |
Pest control | Yes | Yes (100%) |
Official control, sampling | Yes | No (0%) |
Samples as self-control | Yes | Reduced (50–90%) |
Self-monitoring and related documentation | Yes | Reduced (80%) |
Eradication of Salmonella when detected | Yes | No (0%) |
CONTROL AT MOBILE FEED MIXERS | ||
Treatment of feed | Yes | Reduced (50%) |
Official control and sampling | Yes | No (0%) |
Maintaining appropriate hygiene | Yes | Yes (100%) |
Samples as self-control | Yes | Reduced (50–90%) |
Self-monitoring and related documentation | Yes | Reduced (75%) |
Eradication of Salmonella when detected | Yes | Reduced (0–100%) |
CONTROL AT PIG FARMS | ||
Treatment of feed, acid treatment | Yes | Yes (100%) |
Sampling | Yes | Yes (100%) |
Maintaining appropriate hygiene | Yes | Yes (100%) |
Eradication of Salmonella when detected | Yes | Yes, if detected in pigs (100%) |
CONTROL AT SLAUGHTERHOUSE | ||
Extra measures if Salmonella is detected | Yes | Yes (100%) |
In the current control policy scenario, all costs and measures were applied in full, which corresponds to 100% adoption rate in the reduced control scenario. Percentages in the reduced control scenario indicate which proportion of current control measures were applied, and hence, which proportion of costs were incurred when compared to the current control policy scenario.
Heat treatment for production volumes more than 6 million kilograms, except liquid feed, vitamin, and mineral mixes.