Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 9;10:434. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00434

Table 2.

Effect of RES on the plasma concentrations of TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, VLDL-C, FFA, and amylase in NAFLD rats.

Group Dose (mg/kg) n TC (mM) TG (mM) HDL-C (mM) LDL-C (mM) VLDL-C (mM) FFA (mM) Amylase (U/L)
CON 8 1.91 ± 0.04 0.65 ± 0.03 2.21 ± 0.05 0.46 ± 0.02 11.71 ± 0.66 926.44 ± 28.47 2,307.12 ± 128.36
CON + RES 15 5 1.94 ± 0.02## 0.64 ± 0.02# 2.12 ± 0.06## 0.43 ± 0.02## 10.20 ± 0.52 947.80 ± 24.38 2,345.00 ± 118.06
NAFLD 8 2.51 ± 0.05** 0.74 ± 0.03* 1.76 ± 0.02** 0.78 ± 0.02** 10.52 ± 0.26 893.57 ± 15.62 2,210.25 ± 101.61
NAFLD + RES 15 8 1.90 ± 0.04## 0.69 ± 0.02 2.01 ± 0.04## 0.54 ± 0.02## 12.10 ± 0.40 933.53 ± 22.59 2,238.62 ± 72.91
NAFLD + STG 10 8 1.98 ± 0.04## 0.66 ± 0.02 2.01 ± 00.03## 0.52 ± 0.02## 13.53 ± 1.04 913.97 ± 20.18 2,255.25 ± 62.34
NAFLD + RSG 5 8 2.01 ± 0.02## 0.65 ± 0.03# 2.00 ± 0.03## 0.51 ± 0.03## 10.19 ± 0.40 877.79 ± 12.07 2,265.44 ± 66.23
NAFLD + FLX 2 8 2.51 ± 0.05 0.75 ± 0.04 1.74 ± 0.03 0.74 ± 0.03 13.51 ± 0.87 907.73 ± 16.74 2,102.12 ± 64.48
NAFLD + DNP 1 8 2.44 ± 0.06 0.66 ± 0.04 1.82 ± 0.04 0.78 ± 0.02 10.94 ± 0.64 921.20 ± 20.54 2,038.12 ± 140.68
*

P < 0.05 and

**

P < 0.001 compared with the CON group;

#

P < 0.05 and

##

P < 0.001 compared with the NAFLD model group.