Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 9;10:841. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00841

Table 5.

Mean value and 95% confidence interval of the most significant indices comparing IDC patients and CON subjects.

Index IDC (N = 91) CON (N = 49) p-value
HRJSDds-E0d 0.018 [0.014; 0.021] 0.0064 [0.0048; 0.0071] ***
NSTPDCcs_Area_c-s 0.25 [0.23; 0.28] 0.15 [0.13; 0.17] ***
PPAc_SD1 14.18 [10.44; 17.93] 23.27 [20.70; 25.84] **
PPAc_SD1/SD2 0.29 [0.23; 0.34] 0.36 [0.33; 0.38] **
HRJSDcd-E2d 0.02 [0.18; 0.21] 0.05 [0.045; 0.054] *
HRJSDcd-LD1d 0.23 [0.22;0.24] 0.28 [0.27; 0.29] **
HRJSDds_LD1-E2 0.0014 [0.0010; 0.0018] 0.0053 [0.0035; 0.0071] ***
HRJSDcd_E0-LA1 0.0004 [0.00028; 0.00053] 0.00014 [0.00010; 0.00019] ***
HRJSDds_LD1-LD1 0.069 [0.063; 0.074] 0.093 [0.086; 0.10] ***
*

ρ ≤ 0.01;

**

ρ ≤ 0.001;

***

ρ ≤ 0.0000167; n.s. ρ ≥ 0.01; IDC, idiopathic cardiomyopathic patients; CON, control group; PPA, Poincaré plot analysis; HRJSD, high resolution joint symbolic dynamic; NSTPDC, normalized short-time partial directed coherence; cd, cardio-diastolic coupling; cs, cardio-systolic coupling; ds, diastolic-systolic coupling.