Table 1.
FMT |
CT |
P value |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Low RFI | High RFI | Low RFI | High RFI | SEM | FMT | RFI | FMT × RFI |
g_Lactobacillus | 0.68 | 0.35 | 1.23 | 0.90 | 0.254 | 0.036 | 0.195 | 0.995 |
g_Ruminococcus | 3.11 | 3.70 | 2.57 | 2.94 | 0.380 | 0.093 | 0.215 | 0.772 |
g_[Ruminococcus] | 2.42 | 2.79 | 1.30 | 1.79 | 0.460 | 0.025 | 0.352 | 0.904 |
o_RF39;f_;g_ | 0.68 | 1.01 | 1.15 | 0.40 | 0.264 | 0.788 | 0.429 | 0.045 |
g_Dorea | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.042 | 0.047 | 0.912 | 0.528 |
f_Lachnospiraceae;f_;g_ | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.035 | 0.190 | 0.032 | 0.520 |
f_Bacillaceae;g_ | 0.016 | 0.022 | 0.098 | 0.035 | 0.023 | 0.050 | 0.229 | 0.146 |
f_Ruminococcaceae;g_ | 0.030 | 0.027 | 0.048 | 0.049 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.889 | 0.833 |
Data are presented as least-square means and pooled SEM. Low RFI FMT females, n = 8; low RFI FMT males, n = 7; high RFI FMT females, n = 7; high-RFI FMT males, n = 6; low RFI CT females, n = 7; low-RFI CT males, n = 7; high-RFI CT females, n = 7; high-RFI CT males, n = 7.