Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 6;55(6):250. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060250

Table 3.

Comparison of mean difference between the intervention and comparison group at T1 and T2 when adjusted for baseline and age, in the linear regression model (ANCOVA).

Gait Parameters T0–T1 T0–T2
n Mean Difference
(95% CI)
p Value n Mean Difference
(95% CI)
p Value
Knee angle, foot strike (deg)
Hip angle, foot strike (deg)
Pelvic angle foot strike (deg)
Minimum knee angle in stands (deg)
Step length (cm)
Speed (m/s)
Six-Minute Walk Test (m)
Gait deviation index
34
34
34
34
34
34
31
34
−2.4 (−5.8 to 1.0)
−3.7 (−7.9 to 0.5)
−1.6 (−3.9 to 0.7)
−2.2 (−5.7 to1.4)
−1.5 (−5.3 to 2.2)
−0.1 (−0.2 to 0.05)
10.6 (−29.3 to 50.6)
−1.0 (−5.3 to3.3)
0.161
0.081
0.172
0.228
0.408
0.188
0.590
0.650
34
34
34
34
34
34
31
34
−3.9 (−8.5 to 0.6)
−2.8 (−6.9 to 1.3)
0.6 (−1.8 to 2.9)
−3.2 (−7.3 to 1.0)
−3.3 (−7.9 to 1.2)
−0.02 (−0.02 to 0.2)
7.2 (−43.3 to 57.7)
−1.4 (−5.6 to 2.8)
0.088
0.175
0.638
0.128
0.149
0.778
0.772
0.504

T1: 16 weeks follow-up, T2: 32 weeks follow-up, n: number of participants, CI: confidence interval, deg: degrees, statistically significant: p < 0.05.