Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 18;24(12):2263. doi: 10.3390/molecules24122263

Table 3.

Capacitance comparison of PANI/CNTs composites obtained from different experimental methods.

Material Specific Capacitance/F g−1 Capacity Retention
(Cycle Number)
Ref.
3D PANI/CNT arrays 359 F g−1 at 1.56 mA cm−2 80.02% (5000) [69]
PANI/GO/MWCNTs 696 F g−1 at 20 mV s−1 89% (3000) [70]
PANI/CNTs/Graphene 0.79 F cm−2 at 1.5 mA cm−2 76% (3000) [71]
RGO/CNTs/PANI 359 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 80.5% (2000) [72]
CNF/CNTs/PANI 0.067 F cm−2 at 0.5 mA cm−2 90% (5000) [73]
MWCNTs/PANI 809.6 F g−1 at 25 mV s−1 78% (2000) [74]
CNT/PANI 0.016 F cm−2 at 0.25 mA cm−2 63% (500) [75]
CNT/PANI network 632 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 / [76]
CNF-CNTs/PANI 5.6 F cm−2 at 2 mA cm−2 85% (5000) [77]
Polylactic acid/PANI/CNTs 510 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 99.5% (2000) [78]