Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 9;13:137. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00137

TABLE 1.

Participants’ characteristics and group comparisons.

Control
ADHD
Comparison
M SD M SD U Z Parameter
Age 16.0 1.3 15.3 1.4 546.5* −2.2
Socioeconomic status 1 15.4 39.6 19.3 603.5 −1.4
Education 10.0 1.0 10.0 1.2 405.5∗∗ −3.3
Inattention (SNAP-IV) 10.5 10.4 26.0 9.8 1430.0∗∗ −4.9 >151
Hyperactivity/impulsivity (SNAP-IV) 4.1 3.7 12.2 6.1 1513.0∗∗ −3.7 >101
ODD symptoms (SNAP-IV) 4.0 4.4 10.1 6.1 1609.0∗∗ −2.4 >71
Urgency (UPPS) 28.6 6.8 30.9 8.0 654.5 −1.1 29.0 (6.0)2
Premeditation (UPPS) 24.5 8.0 25.5 7.2 688.0 −0.7 24.0 (5.0)2
Perseverance score (UPPS) 23.1 6.3 24.5 6.8 688.0 −0.7 21.0 (5.0)2
Sensation seeking (UPPS) 31.7 7.2 34.9 6.8 583.0 −1.8 34.0 (7.0)2
Juvenile Love Scale (15 items) 76.3 31.6 77.7 35.2 738.5 −0.3 .

SE, standard error; U, Mann–Whitney U-test; Z, difference between standard scores. *p = 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. 1Cutoff for ADHD according to Costa et al. (2018), 2We found no Brazilian normative values for adolescents in UPPS, so we added parameters – Mean (SD) based in d’Acremont and Van der Linden (2005) community study. This second parameter should be interpreted carefully, since the referred study was conducted with French Adolescents, a different culture from our sample.