TABLE 1.
Control |
ADHD |
Comparison |
|||||
M | SD | M | SD | U | Z | Parameter | |
Age | 16.0 | 1.3 | 15.3 | 1.4 | 546.5* | −2.2 | – |
Socioeconomic status | 1 | 15.4 | 39.6 | 19.3 | 603.5 | −1.4 | – |
Education | 10.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 1.2 | 405.5∗∗ | −3.3 | – |
Inattention (SNAP-IV) | 10.5 | 10.4 | 26.0 | 9.8 | 1430.0∗∗ | −4.9 | >151 |
Hyperactivity/impulsivity (SNAP-IV) | 4.1 | 3.7 | 12.2 | 6.1 | 1513.0∗∗ | −3.7 | >101 |
ODD symptoms (SNAP-IV) | 4.0 | 4.4 | 10.1 | 6.1 | 1609.0∗∗ | −2.4 | >71 |
Urgency (UPPS) | 28.6 | 6.8 | 30.9 | 8.0 | 654.5 | −1.1 | 29.0 (6.0)2 |
Premeditation (UPPS) | 24.5 | 8.0 | 25.5 | 7.2 | 688.0 | −0.7 | 24.0 (5.0)2 |
Perseverance score (UPPS) | 23.1 | 6.3 | 24.5 | 6.8 | 688.0 | −0.7 | 21.0 (5.0)2 |
Sensation seeking (UPPS) | 31.7 | 7.2 | 34.9 | 6.8 | 583.0 | −1.8 | 34.0 (7.0)2 |
Juvenile Love Scale (15 items) | 76.3 | 31.6 | 77.7 | 35.2 | 738.5 | −0.3 | . |
SE, standard error; U, Mann–Whitney U-test; Z, difference between standard scores. *p = 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. 1Cutoff for ADHD according to Costa et al. (2018), 2We found no Brazilian normative values for adolescents in UPPS, so we added parameters – Mean (SD) based in d’Acremont and Van der Linden (2005) community study. This second parameter should be interpreted carefully, since the referred study was conducted with French Adolescents, a different culture from our sample.