Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 1;3(2):554–561. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01440307

Table 2.

A comparison of the pulmonary artery catheter and the central venous cathetera

Parameter PAC Central Venous Catheter Relative Accuracy of Each Parameter
Obtainable measurements
 SvO2 + ++
 CO + ++
 intrapulmonary vascular pressures (pulmonary artery systolic and pulmonary artery diastolic) + ++
 preload variable, PaOP +
 preload variable, CVP + +
 ScvO2 + + +
 continuous ScvO2b + + +
Adverse effects Incidence (%)
 thrombosisb + + 2 to 67
 pneumothorax + + 0.3 to 3.0
 arterial puncture + + 1.1 to 1.3
 hematoma or hemorrhage + + 1 to 5
 vascular infection + + 0.7 to 11.4
 arrhythmias + +
  minor dysrhythmias + + 4.7 to 68.9
  severe dysrhythmias + 0.3 to 62.7
  right bundle brand block + 0.1 to 4.3
  complete heart block + 0.05 to 5.00
 catheter fragment or knots + <1
 pulmonary infarct + <1
 pulmonary rupture + 0.1 to 1.5
Can be used outside the ICU (regular medical or surgical floor) +
Costc ++ +
a

CO, cardiac output; CVP, central venous pressure; ICU, intensive care unit; PAC, pulmonary artery catheter; PaOP, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure; ScvO2, central venous saturation; SvO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation

b

Incidence varies depending on location (femoral versus subclavian) and duration of the catheter. Many thromboses are discovered on postmortem evaluation and are not clinically relevant (29).

c

A meta-analysis of five trials demonstrated that costs were higher for patients who were treated using PAC compared with those without PAC. One study showed that the cost per quality-adjusted life year gained from withdrawing a PAC was $5672(31,32).