Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 1;3(2):554–561. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01440307

Table 3.

Features of minimally invasive CO techniques and devices

Technique/Device Invasiveness Estimate of Cardiac Preload Limitations/Considerations
Echocardiogram Noninvasive Yes Not continuous
Trained interpreter required
Esophageal Doppler flow Esophageal probe required Yes Patient needs to be immobile
Probe must be in proper position
Specialized training required
Partial CO2 rebreathing technique Noninvasive No Affected by V/Q mismatch
Affected by changes in metabolism
TEB Noninvasive No Decreased accuracy with edema and cardiac arrhythmias
Only modest correlation with thermodilution
Transpulmonary thermodilution Venous and arterial access Yes (ITBV) Good correlation with pulmonary artery thermodilution
Lithium dilution Venous and arterial access No Calculation of CO depends on accurate sodium and hemoglobin concentration
Multiple blood draws
Potential for lithium adverse effects
Pulse contour analyses Arterial catheter One technique Yes See Table 4
(PICCO) requires central access
a

TEB, thoracic electrical bioimpedance; ITBV, intrathoracic blood volume.