Skip to main content
. 2019 May 28;8(6):140. doi: 10.3390/plants8060140

Table 2.

MM-GBSA analysis for the interaction of the different complexes formed between FaEG1 with the different XG and cellulose ligands.

Complex ΔHvdWMM (kcal mol−1) ΔHelecMM (kcal mol−1) ΔGsol–pol (kcal mol−1) ΔGsol–npol (kcal mol−1) ΔGbind (kcal mol−1)
FcEG1 Cellulose −67.21 −71.11 67.30 −52.30 −123.32 ± 9 a
XXXGXXXG −55.21 −58.14 63.10 −25.06 −75.31 ± 5 ab
XXFGXXFG −52.85 −26.51 46.68 −30.97 −63.65 ± 8 b

ΔHvdWMM, van der Waals contributions; ΔHelecMM, electrostatic contribution; ΔGsol–pol, ΔGsol–npol, contribution of solvation; ΔGbind, total binding energy. Different superscripted letters indicate significant differences in each protein with the different ligands. (Tukey HSD test, P = 0.05).