Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 15;38:309. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1294-9

Table 3.

Univariate analysis in terms of OS (overall survival) and EFI (event free survival) with correction for competing risks and on the total population

Variable SHR 95% C.I. p value
EFI
 NPM1 Continuous 0.99 0.98–1.00 0.147
 NPM1 nucleolus No 1
Yes 1.83 0.79–4.27 0.161
 NPM1 with cut-off > 50% 1
≤50% 1.43 0.69–3.02 0.334
 nAPE1 Continuous 0.99 0.98–1.00 0.344
 cAPE1 Continuous 1.01 0.99–1.02 0.149
 Tumor size 1 1
2 1.35 0.58–3.14 0.491
3 or 4 3.48 0.79–15.44 0.100
 Nodal status Negative 1
Positive 2.05 0.92–4.58 0.079
 Neo/Adj Anthracyclines No 1
Yes 1.06 0.47–2.39 0.886
 Neo/Adj Taxanes No 1
Yes 0.82 0.39–1.69 0.585
OS HR 95% C.I. p value
 NPM1 nucleolus No 1
Yes 1.37 0.59–3.20 0.464
 NPM1 with cut-off > 50% 1
≤50% 1.25 0.61–2.57 0.541
 nAPE1 Continuous 1 0.99–1.01 0.767
 cAPE1 Continuous 1 0.99–1.01 0.553
 Tumor size 1 1
2 1.73 0.73–4.11 0.214
3 or 4 12.59 4.30–36.84 < 0.001
 Nodal status Negative 1
Positive 1.47 0.68–3.17 0.328
 Neo/Adj Anthracyclines No 1
Yes 0.45 0.22–0.91 0.026
 Neo/Adj Taxanes No 1
Yes 0.50 0.24–1.02 0.055

Tumor size was confirmed as the most important prognostic factor. nAPE1 (nuclear APE1), cAPE1 (cytoplasmic APE1) NPM1 (NPM1low vs NPM1high), HR (hazard ratio), SHR (subdistribution hazard ratio)