Table 3.
Comparison with other reported methods.
| Method | Detection System | Extraction Solvent | Linear Range (μg/mL) |
R2 | LOD (μg/mL) |
LOQ (μg/mL) |
Average Recovery (%, n = 3) |
References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ultrasonic- assisted solid liquid extraction |
HPLC | methanol | 1–200 | 0.99926 | 0.18 | 0.51 | 92.64 | This study |
| solid liquid extraction |
Methanol + H2O (0.1% v/v formic acid) | 1–300 | 0.9993 | 0.33 | 1.06 | 99.2 | [32] | |
| ionic liquid-based cloud-point extraction | 25% HCl | 1–20 | 0.998 | 0.002 | - | 92.5 | [33] | |
| rat plasma extraction |
rat plasma | 0.1–25 | 0.9941 | 0.05 | 0.1 | - | [34] | |
| ultrahigh pressure extraction | 60% methanol | 0.005–0.05 | 0.9994 | 0.039 | 0.13 | 98.8 | [35] |