Table 2.
Doctors’ experience working with International teams consisting of a Danish speaking and non-Danish speaking students
| International teams, in total | International teams at Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecologya | International teams at Department of Pediatricsb | p-values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Have you worked with students who trained in pairs? | 45% (51/113) | 25% (13/53) | 63% (38/60) | < 0.001d |
| If you worked with students who trained in pairs, how do you rate this? | 6 (3–7), n = 50 | 6 (3–7), N = 13 | 6 (4–7), N = 38 | 0.542c |
| If you worked with students who trained in pairs, did you give feedback to the students? | 90% (43/48) | 92% (12/13) | 90% (34/38) | 0.808 |
| If you have given feedback to a pair of students, how do you rate this? | 6 (3–7), n = 46 | 6 (3–7), N = 12 | 6 (4–7), N = 35 | 0.529c |
| Doctors who support that the departments continue with the international teams | 90% (92/102) | 94% (46/49) | 87% (46/53) | 0.385 |
Median (range) rates. The questions were evaluated on a 7-point Likert scale with rating of 1 = unacceptable, 4 = acceptable and 7 = excellent
aThe meetings were in English
bThe majority of meetings was in Danish
cMann–Whitney test done by http://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/mannwhitney/Default2.aspx
dYates corrected Chi square test done by http://www.openepi.com/Menu/OE_Menu.htm