Skip to main content
. 2010 May 26;30(21):7202–7214. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3403-09.2010

Table 3.

Results of the statistical analyses (repeated-measures ANOVAs) for the eight identified clusters of solution points

Cluster # Hemisphere Number of SPs Task effect Task × SP interaction SPs with p < 0.05 Smallest p value Talairach coordinates Localization
1 Left 22 NS F(21,168) = 3.81 0 p = 0.0507 −60.73, −42.2, −2.79 Temporo-parietal junction
p < 0.0001**
2 Left 14 NS NS
3 Right 5 NS NS
4 Right 18 NS F(17,136) = 2.33 10 p = 0.0403 21.27, −93.68, −5.56 Inferior occipital cortex
p = 0.0037**
5 Right 12 F(1,8) = 18.36 F(11,88) = 2.03 12 p = 0.0008 33.76, −31.29, 54.55 Postcentral gyrus
p = 0.0027** p = 0.0348*
6 Right 27 F(1,8) = 11.26 F(26,208) = 4.51 27 p = 0.0072 31.68, −2.17, 52.65 Premotor cortex
p = 0.0100* p < 0.0001**
7 Right 14 F(1,8) = 10.44 NS 12 p = 0.0068 27.67, 48.27, 30.02 Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
p = 0.0120*
8 Right 105 F(1,8) = 10.81 F(104,832) = 1.90 105 p = 0.0111 57.57, −15.95, −9.93 Anterior temporal cortex
p = 0.0111* p < 0.0001**

Clusters 1, 4, 6, and 8 showed a significant task × solution point interaction, and cluster 5 showed a significant effect of task. Concerning cluster 1, post hoc tests only reported a trend (*α = 0.05; **α = 0.00625, Bonferroni's corrected). SP, Solution point.