Table 1.
Grip-type and orientation tuning across epochs
| Orientation tuning |
Grip-type tuning |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cue | Planning | Movement | Number of cells | Cue | Planning | Movement | Number of cells |
| + | + | + | 33 (8%) | + | + | + | 42 (10%) |
| + | + | − | 28 (7%) | + | + | − | 22 (5%) |
| + | − | + | 8 (2%) | + | − | + | 16 (4%) |
| + | − | − | 41 (10%) | + | − | − | 35 (8%) |
| − | + | + | 12 (3%) | − | + | + | 29 (7%) |
| − | + | − | 29 (7%) | − | + | − | 19 (5%) |
| − | − | + | 29 (7%) | − | − | + | 93 (22%) |
| − | − | − | 240 (57%) | − | − | − | 164 (39%) |
Number (and percentage) of cells for possible combinations of orientation tuning and grip-type tuning during the cue, planning, and movement epochs. Significant tuning is indicated by +, no tuning by −.