Table 1.
Treatment | No. of animals | MUA |
LH concentrations |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of volleys | Mean duration (s) | Mean amplitude (%)a | No. of pulses | AUC (%)b | ||
OVX | ||||||
Vehicle | 5 | 2.4 ± 0.24 | 127.3 ± 9.8 | 101.9 ± 3.5 | 0.8 ± 0.49 | 104.0 ± 9.5 |
0.2 nmol | 4 | 3.5 ± 0.29 | 193.3 ± 32.4 | 84.8 ± 8.5 | 1.5 ± 0.29 | 91.6 ± 8.0 |
2 nmol | 5c | 5.0 ± 0.82** | 234.8 ± 37.2* | 79.2 ± 4.3* | 0.6 ± 0.24 | 84.3 ± 5.0** |
OVX + E2 | ||||||
Vehicle | 4 | 1.3 ± 0.25 | 42.5 ± 10.3 | 104.2 ± 6.7 | 1.3 ± 0.25 | 89.1 ± 4.6 |
2 nmol | 4 | 1.8 ± 0.75 | 128.3 ± 34.7 | 111.2 ± 9.8 | 1.3 ± 0.25 | 96.0 ± 5.2 |
aValues are expressed as a percentage of the mean amplitude of MUA volleys observed before the injection on the experimental day.
bThe area under the curve (AUC) of LH concentrations. Values are expressed as percentage of the AUC during the 1 h period before the injection.
cMUA data were analyzed in only four goats because electrical noise prevented accurate analysis in one animal.
*p < 0.05 and
**p < 0.01 versus vehicle control.