Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 2;2019:3252178. doi: 10.1155/2019/3252178

Table 2.

Comparison of the performances of different CBFV onset detection methods in terms of TPR (%) and PPV (%) using the default values of their parameters and for threshold of T = 30, T = 20 and T = 10ms.

T = 30ms T = 20ms T = 10ms
Method TPR PPV TPR PPV TPR PPV
Chen method 87.24 95.91 87.05 95.70 86.91 95.55
Asgari method 93.15 93.30 92.81 92.86 90.32 90.46
Farooq method 98.08 97.75 95.96 95.63 65.36 65.14