Table 1.

Information about the lexico-semantic norms used in Study 1 and 2: Amount of words, number of raters per word, and split-half reliabilities.

	Study 1			Study 2
	Words	Raters	Reliability	Words	Raters	Reliability
Valencea	4,299	64	.99d	13,915	20	.91
Arousala	4,299	64	.97d	13,915	20	.69
Dominancea	4,299	64	.96d	13,915	20	.77
AoAb	4,299	32	.97d	30,121	18+	.92
Concretenessc	30,070	15	.91–.93d,e	37,058	25+	–

^a Norms from Moors et al. (2013) for Study 1 and from Warriner et al. (2013) for Study 2. ^b Norms from Moors et al. (2013) for Study 1 and from Kuperman et al. (2012) for Study 2. ^c Norms from Brysbaert, Stevens, et al. (2014) for Study 1 and from Brysbaert, Warriner, and Kuperman (2014) for Study 2. ^d Spearman-Brown corrected split-half correlations calculated on 10,000 different randomizations of the participants. ^e Reliabilities of each of five lists of ca. 6,000 words were within this range.