. 2019 Mar 21;85(1):44. doi: 10.5334/aogh.920

Table 2.

Coverage of birth preparedness actions and their association with facility delivery.

	Total	Nonfacility delivery	Facility delivery	Unadjusted analysis^a

N = 215	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	OR^b	P-value	95% CI^b

Planned to deliver in an institution^c

	n = 213	n = 115	n = 98
No	61 (29%)	50 (43%)	11 (11%)	1.00
Yes	152 (71%)	65 (57%)	87 (89%)	6.08	0.000	2.44–15.15
Planned for skilled birth attendant

	n = 215	n = 115	n = 100
No	72 (33%)	55 (48%)	17 (17%)	1.00
Yes	143 (67%)	60 (52%)	83 (83%)	4.48	0.001	1.96–10.22
Saved money

	n = 215	n = 115	n = 100
No	62 (29%)	41 (36%)	21 (21%)	1.00
Yes	153 (71%)	74 (64%)	79 (79%)	2.08	0.024	1.11–3.92
Prepared transport

	n = 215	n = 115	n = 100
No	131 (61%)	81 (70%)	50 (50%)	1.00
Yes	84 (39%)	34 (30%)	50 (50%)	2.38	0.019	1.17–4.86
Prepared clean delivery materials

	n = 215	n = 115	n = 100
No	44 (21%)	28 (24%)	16 (16%)	1.00
Yes	171 (80%)	87 (76%)	84 (84%)	1.68	0.179	0.78–3.67
Prepared food

	n = 215	n = 115	n = 100
No	20 (9%)	12 (10%)	8 (8%)	1.00
Yes	195 (91%)	103 (90%)	92 (92%)	1.34	0.595	0.44–4.05
Well prepared^d

	n = 213	n = 115	n = 98
No	62 (29%)	50 (44%)	12 (12%)	1.00
Yes	151 (71%)	65 (57%)	86 (88%)	5.51	<0.001	2.41–12.57

^a Unadjusted analysis using logistic regression accounting for clustering by enumeration area.

^b Confidence interval (CI), odds ratio (OR).

^c Missing two values.

^d A mother was considered well prepared for birth if she reported completing at least four of the following six actions in advance of her delivery: identified a skilled provider, identified an institution, saved money, identified transport, prepared clean delivery materials, and prepared food.