Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 24;2(1):3. doi: 10.5334/joc.52

Table 2.

Correlations between age, sex, cognitive and antisaccade measurements.

Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1 Age
2 Sex .14
3 IQ –.03 –.22 **
4 TMT-B1 .19 * –.12 –.50 **
5 WCST2 .07 .24 ** –.45 ** .33 **
6 Stroop .22 * –.06 –.31 ** .35 ** .08
7 LFL3 –.09 –.12 .49 ** –.44 ** –.22 * –.28 **
8 CFL4 –.11 –.12 .41 ** –.33 ** –.29 ** –.25 ** .54 **
9 SWM5 .35 ** .27 ** –.33 ** .28 ** .30 ** .23 ** –.29 ** –.26 **
10 RVIP6 –.15 .01 .38 ** –.43 ** –.28 ** –.44 ** .30 ** .27 ** –.31 **
11 AS7 Gain –.02 –.17 * .01 –.01 –.02 –.08 .04 .01 –.04 .02
12 AS Latency .24 ** .09 –.16 .28 ** .20 * .18 * –.22 ** –.13 .24 ** –.15 .17 *
13 AS Spatial Error .18 * .18 * –.05 –.01 .03 .13 –.04 –.05 .10 –.09 –.69 ** –.14
14 AS Error Rate .09 .13 –.17 * .15 .23 ** .19 * –.13 –.08 .09 –.30 ** –.14 .16 .19 *

Notes: 1Trail Making Task Version B, 2Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, 3Letter Fluency Task, 4Category Fluency Task, 5Spatial Working Memory Task, 6Rapid Visual Information Task, 7Antisaccade, * p < .05, ** p < .01.