Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 20;30(42):13943–13954. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2574-10.2010

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Ultrastructural analysis of optic nerves from Tag-1−/− and Tag-1−/−;plpTg(rTag-1) mice. A, Image from the electron microscope of a cross-sectioned optic nerve from a normal mouse. The dashed lines indicate the areas measured for the calculation of the diameter of the axon with and without the myelin sheath and subsequently the g ratio of the fibers. B, G ratio diagram for the Tag-1−/− (n = 4) and Tag-1−/−;plpTg(rTag-1) (n = 4) mice. There is a small but statistically significant decrease in the g ratio of Tag-1−/−;plpTg(rTag-1) optic nerve fibers compared with the Tag-1−/− (Student's t test, Tag-1−/−, p < 0.05, g0 = 0.735; Tag-1−/−;plpTg(rTag-1), g0 = 0.701; >100 axons measured for each animal). C, D, Electron micrographs of ultrathin cross sections from Tag-1−/− (C) and Tag-1−/−; plpTg(rTag-1) (D) optic nerves. Note the slightly hypomyelinated axons and the reduction in small caliber axons in Tag-1−/− compared with Tag-1−/−;plpTg(rTag-1) nerve. E, Quantification of the percentage of RGC axons with small (<500 nm), medium (500–1500 nm), and large (>1500 nm) caliber in Tag-1+/+ (n = 3), Tag-1−/− (n = 4), and Tag-1−/−;plpTg(rTag-1) (n = 3) optic nerves. Bar graphs depict mean ± SEM. The pool of small caliber axons is increased, whereas the percentage of medium caliber axons is decreased in Tag-1−/−;plpTg(rTag-1) mice compared with homozygous mutants. No statistically significant difference is detected between Tag-1−/−;plpTg(rTag-1) and Tag-1+/+ mice, suggesting the full rescue of the homozygous mutants phenotype (>200 axons measured for each mouse, unpaired Student's t test, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.005, *p < 0.05).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure