Table 3.
CTL | OFC | LF | MF | Group comparison | Post hoc comparison | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total number of reversals | 4.0 ± 1.0 | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 3.4 ± 1.4 | 3.8 ± 1.4 | p = 0.027 | OFC < CTL |
Total number of errors | 16.5 ± 7.0 | 23.9 ± 5.6 | 17.8 ± 5.5 | 17.5 ± 6.7 | p = 0.015 | OFC > CTL |
Errors in initial learning | 2.3 ± 2.2 | 4.5 ± 2.8 | 3.1 ± 2.1 | 2.7 ± 1.7 | p = 0.037 | OFC > CTL |
Errors in first reversal | 5.9 ± 6.3 | 9.7 ± 7.1 | 8.1 ± 7.9 | 6.4 ± 7.1 | p = 0.060 | OFC > CTL |
Group comparison were made with ANOVA, and the post hoc comparison column indicates when significant differences between groups were detected with the Tukey–Kramer test (p < 0.05).