Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 15;30(50):16868–16875. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1958-10.2010

Table 3.

Summary of alternative behavioral measures in the reversal learning task (mean ± SD)

CTL OFC LF MF Group comparison Post hoc comparison
Total number of reversals 4.0 ± 1.0 2.9 ± 0.8 3.4 ± 1.4 3.8 ± 1.4 p = 0.027 OFC < CTL
Total number of errors 16.5 ± 7.0 23.9 ± 5.6 17.8 ± 5.5 17.5 ± 6.7 p = 0.015 OFC > CTL
Errors in initial learning 2.3 ± 2.2 4.5 ± 2.8 3.1 ± 2.1 2.7 ± 1.7 p = 0.037 OFC > CTL
Errors in first reversal 5.9 ± 6.3 9.7 ± 7.1 8.1 ± 7.9 6.4 ± 7.1 p = 0.060 OFC > CTL

Group comparison were made with ANOVA, and the post hoc comparison column indicates when significant differences between groups were detected with the Tukey–Kramer test (p < 0.05).