Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2019 Apr 29;141(18):7486–7497. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b02158

Table1.

Electronic effects of the TPMA family ligands.a

graphic file with name nihms-1039010-t0014.jpg
ligand ΔGexp ΔGDFT EHOMOb Vbur%c ΔEdist(TS)d ΔEdist(BrCuIIL)e
TPMA 15.0 16.6 −7.66 39.2 2.1 4.0
TPMA*3 12.0 14.6 −7.41 40.3 2.0 3.6
TPMANMe2 10.0 13.0 −7.36 39.0 1.8 3.7
a

kact values are in M−1 s−1. All Gibbs free energies and distortion energies are in kcal/mol; EHOMO is in eV. All energies and EHOMO are computed in acetonitrile using the CPCM solvation model.

b

HOMO energy of [CuIL]+.

c

Percent buried volume of the ligand computed from the DFT-optimized geometry of [CuIL]+.41

d

Distortion energy of the CuL catalyst in the ISET transition state with respect to the ground state [CuIL]+.

e

Distortion energy of the CuL catalyst in the [BrCuIIL]+ complex with respect to the ground state [CuIL]+.