Table 1.
Molecules | Mechanism | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Recombinant wildtype allergens | Since B-cell and T-cell epitopes are intact, induces blocking IgGs and targets T cells | Good immunogenicity and induction of blocking IgGs | Immediate allergic reactions possible as all IgE epitopes are intact |
T-cell tolerance induction, possible | Late-phase skin reactions because of allergen-specific T-cell epitopes | ||
Short synthetic peptides | Peptides derived from T-cell epitopes of allergens are meant to induce tolerance | No early phase reactions because of loss of IgE reactivity | No induction of allergen-specific blocking IgGs as peptides are too short |
Possible activation of regulatory T cells | Late-phase skin reactions possible because of activation of allergen specific T cells | ||
Contiguous long overlapping peptides | Long peptides covering all linear epitopes of allergen for induction of tolerance and protective IgGs | Immunogenicity and induction of protective IgGs | Late-phase skin and pulmonary symptoms observed because of maintained allergen-specific T-cell epitopes |
No early phase reactions because of loss of three-dimensional structure | Applicable only for simple allergen sources like birch but not for complex allergen sources | ||
Nucleic acid-based strategies | Vaccination with DNA or RNA-encoding allergens should drive immune response toward Th1 | Reduced risk of inducing systemic side effects | DNA may integrate into genome |
Potential for preventive approaches | Mostly studied in animal models, only few clinical studies in humans | ||
Recombinant hypoallergens (fragments, folding variants, mosaics, mutants) | Reduced IgE reactivity because of altered structure but maintained B-cell and T-cell epitopes for IgG induction and tolerance induction | Good immunogenicity and protective IgGs | Late-phase skin reactions because of allergen-specific T-cell epitopes |
T-cell tolerance induction, possible | Folding variants may be difficult for production | ||
Reduced early phase reactions because of lack of IgE reactivity | |||
Second generation recombinant hypoallergens (peptide carrier fusion proteins) | B-cell epitopes from allergens fused to viral carrier protein for induction of blocking IgGs against allergen and against viral protein | Good immunogenicity and protective IgGs | |
No late phase reactions as allergen-specific T-cell epitopes are reduced and T-cell help comes from viral carrier | |||
Protective against allergy and against virus that was used as a carrier | |||
Applicable to simple and complex allergen sources | |||
Suitability for preventive approaches | |||
No induction of IgE responses | |||
Recombinant allergen-specific antibodies | Passive immunotherapy with recombinant high-affinity allergen specific IgGs that compete with the binding of IgE | Good effectiveness with minimal side effects | Applicable only for allergen sources with dominant major allergens like cat or birch |
Costly | |||
Effects not long-lasting |
IgG, Immunoglobulin G.