Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 27;19(4):402–414. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000536

Table 1.

Mechanisms, advantages and disadvantages of different allergen-specific immunotherapy molecules

Molecules Mechanism Advantages Disadvantages
Recombinant wildtype allergens Since B-cell and T-cell epitopes are intact, induces blocking IgGs and targets T cells Good immunogenicity and induction of blocking IgGs Immediate allergic reactions possible as all IgE epitopes are intact
T-cell tolerance induction, possible Late-phase skin reactions because of allergen-specific T-cell epitopes
Short synthetic peptides Peptides derived from T-cell epitopes of allergens are meant to induce tolerance No early phase reactions because of loss of IgE reactivity No induction of allergen-specific blocking IgGs as peptides are too short
Possible activation of regulatory T cells Late-phase skin reactions possible because of activation of allergen specific T cells
Contiguous long overlapping peptides Long peptides covering all linear epitopes of allergen for induction of tolerance and protective IgGs Immunogenicity and induction of protective IgGs Late-phase skin and pulmonary symptoms observed because of maintained allergen-specific T-cell epitopes
No early phase reactions because of loss of three-dimensional structure Applicable only for simple allergen sources like birch but not for complex allergen sources
Nucleic acid-based strategies Vaccination with DNA or RNA-encoding allergens should drive immune response toward Th1 Reduced risk of inducing systemic side effects DNA may integrate into genome
Potential for preventive approaches Mostly studied in animal models, only few clinical studies in humans
Recombinant hypoallergens (fragments, folding variants, mosaics, mutants) Reduced IgE reactivity because of altered structure but maintained B-cell and T-cell epitopes for IgG induction and tolerance induction Good immunogenicity and protective IgGs Late-phase skin reactions because of allergen-specific T-cell epitopes
T-cell tolerance induction, possible Folding variants may be difficult for production
Reduced early phase reactions because of lack of IgE reactivity
Second generation recombinant hypoallergens (peptide carrier fusion proteins) B-cell epitopes from allergens fused to viral carrier protein for induction of blocking IgGs against allergen and against viral protein Good immunogenicity and protective IgGs
No late phase reactions as allergen-specific T-cell epitopes are reduced and T-cell help comes from viral carrier
Protective against allergy and against virus that was used as a carrier
Applicable to simple and complex allergen sources
Suitability for preventive approaches
No induction of IgE responses
Recombinant allergen-specific antibodies Passive immunotherapy with recombinant high-affinity allergen specific IgGs that compete with the binding of IgE Good effectiveness with minimal side effects Applicable only for allergen sources with dominant major allergens like cat or birch
Costly
Effects not long-lasting

IgG, Immunoglobulin G.