Table 4.
χ2 (df) | p | Ratio (<2) | Hoelter CN (>200) | CFI, IFI, TLI, NNFI (>=0.95) | SRMR (<=0.08) | RMSEA [95% CI of RMSEA] (<=0.06) | Baseline RMSEA (>0.158) | AIC | Adj BIC | γ-Hat (>=0.95) | Adj γ-Hat (>=0.95) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Starting model | 328.87 (143) | 0.001 | 2.30 | 667+ | 0.96+ | 0.03+ | 0.035 [0.03–0.04]∗ | 0.1598+ | 86326 | 86417 | 0.98+ | 0.98+ |
Final model | 329.36 (144) | 0.001 | 2.29 | 671+ | 0.96+ | 0.03+ | 0.035 [0.03–0.04]∗ | 0.1598+ | 86325 | 86414 | 0.98+ | 0.98+ |
χ2, chi square; df, degrees of freedom; p, level of signification; CN, critical N; CFI, comparative fit index; IFI, incremental fit index; TLI, tucker lewis index; NNFI, non-normed fit index; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; CI, confidence interval; AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; γ-Hat, gamma hat index; adj γ-Hat, adjusted gamma hat index. ∗Indicative that the RMSEA is significant at 0.05. In all variants, “+” is indicative that the statistic meets the recommended thresholds of good fit: ρ(χ2) ≥ 0.05, χ2/df ≤ 2, [GFI CFI, IFI, NNFI] ≥ 0.95, SRMR ≤ 0.08, and RMSEA ≤ 0.06 (Hu and Bentler, 1999), [γ-Hat, adj γ-Hat] ≥ 0.95 (Fan and Sivo, 2007), Hoelter CN > 200 (Kenny, 2015). For details see note on Table 3.