Donatelle 2000b.
Methods | Study design: RCT, dates not stated
Country: USA
Setting: 8 Oregon Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) programme counties SOS (Significant Other Supporter) Programme III |
|
Participants | Probably similar to Donatelle 2000a; 186 pregnant smokers, randomised to E1 (N = 67); E2 (N = 59); Controls (N = 60) | |
Interventions | All participants received a 5As intervention (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange) E1 group: USD 25 voucher (local department store) for each month achieving validated abstinence E2 group: USD 25 voucher (local department store) for achieved abstinence + immediate feedback on risks to the foetus associated with CO results. CO ≤ 5 ppm confirmed monthly abstinence |
|
Outcomes | Abstinence at end of pregnancy Biochemical validation by salivary cotinine < 30 ng/ml. CO < 5 ppm monthly |
|
Notes | New for 2015 update Minimal information; emails to the author elicited no responses Funding not stated |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Abstinence biochemically validated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |