Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 16;9:10318. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46560-7

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Morphology of selected Mucor hiemalis strains from sulfidic spring water microbiomes. (A) Adaptation and in situ morphology of mercury-accumulating M. hiemalis strain EH8 (F) attached to a moss leaf. (B) Laser scanning and stereo microscopy revealed similar morphology (S: sporangium, P: sporangiophore) of M. hiemalis EH5, EH8 and EH10 strains. (C) Detailed morphology and adaptation of aquatic M. hiemalis strains. The brush-like morphology of EH11’s in situ microbiome fixed on rock (F, C.1) from the methane–emitting salty sulfidic environment of Künzing spring and of EH8’s ex-situ grown microbiome fixed on expanded clay spheres (C.2) is visible. EH11 (C.3, sporangium S with sporangiophore P) showed spring-like hyphal morphology (C.4 and C.5) due to adaptation to bubbling methane. However, the spring-like hyphal morphology of EH11 disappeared after further cultivations on solid malt extract-agar medium.