Skip to main content
. 2019 May 23;28(8):1423–1436. doi: 10.1002/pro.3640

Figure 3.

Figure 3

SIKE models predict alpha helical structure. Cartoon diagrams of SIKE models showing C‐α backbone colored from blue to red indicating N‐ to C‐terminus, respectively. PHYRE2 predicted two structures with >90% sequence coverage and confidence (probability [from 0 to 100] that the match between SIKE sequence and template is truly homologous), but sequence identity, a potential measure of model accuracy, between SIKE and template was <15% for each model. The I‐TASSER model with the highest C‐score (−1.86 on a scale of −5, 2; remaining models had values <−2.7) and cluster density (0.1486 whereas remaining four models had values <0.064, indicates structure occurs more often in simulation trajectory suggesting higher quality model) is shown. The TM‐score, scale used to measure structural similarity between two structures, is 0.49 ± 0.15, which falls between a value indicative of correct model topology (≥0.5) and random similarity (<0.17). Both programs predict α helical structure ranging from 61% to 93% that is consistent with CD spectral data.