Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 16;19:699. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5881-0

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of predictors of LTP after caudate lobe ablation

Factors Univariate Multivariate
P value HR 95%CI P value
Gender(M/F) 0.401
Age(≤60/>60y) 0.811
Tumor type (naive/recurrent) 0.846
Surgery history of liver (Y/N) 0.655
Etiology (Hepatitis/others) 0.821
Liver cirrhosis (Y/N) 0.499
Antiviral treatment (Y/N) 0.539
ECOG performance status (0/1) 0.768
Child-Pugh (A/B) 0.998
BCLC stage of primary HCC (A/B) 0.661
AFP (≥400/< 400 μg/L) 0.432
PLT (≥100/< 100 × 109/L) 0.530
PT (≤14/> 14 s) 0.877
ALB (≤35/> 35 g/L) 0.280
ALT (≤40/> 40 IU/L) 0.162
TB (≤17.1/> 17.1 mol/L) 0.616
Tumor number (single /multiple) 0.336
Location (Paracaval portion/ Caudate process/ Spiegel’s lobe) 0.466
Tumor size (≤2 cm /> 2 cm) 0.029 3.667 1.043–12.889 0.043
Puncture approach (LA/ RA/ combination approach) 0.921
Treatment strategy RFA/ EA/ RFA-EA 0.099
EA/RFA or RFA-EA 0.223
RFA or EA/RFA-EA 0.054
AM (≥ 5 mm / < 5 mm) 0.336

HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, ECOG East Coast Oncology Group, BCLC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, AFP alpha-fetoprotein, PLT platelets, PT prothrombin time, ALB albumin, ALT alanine aminotransferase, TB total bilirubin, LA left lobe approach, RA right intercostal approach, EA ethanol ablation, RFA radiofrequency ablation, RFA-EA combination of RFA and EA, AM ablative margin