Table 5.
Model 1: Linear regression taking the Dutch restrained eating scale as the dependent variable and the sociodemographic variables as independent ones. | |||||
Unstandardized Beta | t | p-value | Confidence interval | ||
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||
Gender (females vs. malesa) | 0.461 | 6.257 | <0.001 | 0.316 | 0.605 |
Body Mass Index | 0.042 | 6.350 | <0.001 | 0.029 | 0.055 |
High monthly income vs. no incomea | 0.344 | 2.425 | 0.016 | 0.066 | 0.623 |
Intermediate monthly income vs. no incomea | 0.273 | 2.825 | 0.016 | 0.066 | 0.623 |
Variables entered: Age, gender, BMI, marital status and monthly income. R2=0.086 | |||||
Model 2: Linear regression taking the Dutch restrained eating scale as the dependent variable and the pressure variables as independent variables. | |||||
Unstandardized Beta | t | p-value | Confidence interval | ||
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||
Body dissatisfaction score | 0.038 | 6.176 | <0.001 | 0.026 | 0.050 |
BMI | 0.017 | 2.351 | 0.019 | 0.003 | 0.031 |
Practicing sport activities (yes vs. noa) | 0.381 | 5.540 | <0.001 | 0.246 | 0.516 |
Age | 0.010 | 3.434 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.016 |
Gender (females vs. malesa) | 0.356 | 5.038 | <0.001 | 0.217 | 0.494 |
Pressure from TV, magazine to lose your weight | 0.484 | 5.478 | <0.001 | 0.310 | 0.657 |
Intermediate monthly income vs. no incomea | 0.228 | 2.408 | 0.016 | 0.042 | 0.414 |
Variables entered = Age, gender, BMI, marital status, monthly income, caffeine, family history of eating disorders, Pressure from TV, magazine to lose your weight, Practicing sport activities and body dissatisfaction score. R2=0.211 | |||||
Model 3: Linear regression taking the Dutch restrained eating scale as dependent variable and all other scales as independent variables. | |||||
Unstandardized Beta | t | p-value | Confidence interval | ||
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||
Body dissatisfaction score | 0.037 | 5.735 | <0.001 | 0.024 | 0.049 |
Age | 0.011 | 3.543 | <0.001 | 0.005 | 0.017 |
Gender (females vs. malesa) | 0.316 | 4.240 | <0.001 | 0.170 | 0.462 |
BMI | 0.018 | 2.470 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.033 |
State Adult attachment scale-Anxiety | 0.008 | 1.965 | 0.050 | 0.0003 | 0.015 |
Pressure from TV, magazine to lose your weight (yes vs. noa) | 0.458 | 4.969 | <0.001 | 0.277 | 0.639 |
Practicing sport activities (yes vs. noa) | 0.414 | 5.724 | <0.001 | 0.272 | 0.556 |
Emotion regulation cognitive reappraisal facet | 0.014 | 2.876 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.023 |
Intermediate income vs. no incomea | 0.256 | 2.518 | 0.012 | 0.056 | 0.455 |
Variables entered in the model: Age, gender, BMI, marital status, monthly income, caffeine, family history of eating disorders, Pressure from TV, magazine to lose your weight, Practicing sport activities, self-esteem scale, ERQ cognitive reappraisal facet, SAAM-Anxiety, SAAM-avoidance, SAAM-security and Body dissatisfaction score. R2=0.238 |
aReference group; R2 = Nagelkerke value