Table 1.
Key study results | Discussion questions after presenting the results |
---|---|
Question topic: How the products were rated before and after watching a short video on each product using a 1–5 point Likert scale (low=1) Result: Mean ring rating before=2.4 and after=2.8, p<0.001; injection rating before=3.7 and after=3.8, p=0.10; tablet rating before=3.2 and after=3.2, p=0.1420 |
Why do you think ratings changed more for the ring after watching the video but not for the injections or the tablets? |
Question topic: How participants rated the products after watching the video vs after using each for a month Result: Ring after video=2.8, after use=3.7, p<0.001; injection after video=3.8, after use=4.4, p<0.001; tablet after video=3.3, after use=3.5, p=0.01320 | Why do you think more people chose the tablets (20.9%) compared to ring (14.9%) though the average rating of the tablet was lower compared to the ring? |
Question topic: Which Tablets, Ring, Injections as Options (TRIO) product was most preferred (ranking exercise) Result: When condom was added as an option, 10–20% of participants preferred condom to the 3 products.21 |
Why did some women in both countries prefer condoms more than the 3 products? |
Question topic: Which participants switched their products at midpoint in stage 2 and what were their reasons for switching Result: 50 participants (20%) switched, and of those, the following switches were made:21
|
|
Question topic: What was the participant reaction to the products women chose at stage 2 Result: Product choices at stage 2: Injection 64%, ring 15% and tablets 21%. |
What did you find surprising and what came out as you expected? |