Table 4.
Comparison of current work for pesticide extraction with reported literature materials.
| Adsorbent | Method | AD | n | CT | pH | % RSD | % R | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWCNT | DSPE-GC-NPD | 100-500 | 15 | 30 | Neutral range | <10.1% | 67-107% | [58] |
| C18-SiO2-Fe3O4 | MSPE-HPLC-UV | 50 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 5.4-7.2% | 85-92% | [59] |
| Fe3O4@SiO2–C18 | MSPE-HPLC-UV | 70 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 9.2-9.8% | 86-90% | [55] |
| Fe3O4@CNT | MSPE–HPLC | 51.84 | 3 | 36 | 11.15 | 2.3-4.5% | 60-92% | [60] |
| Fe3O4@C | MSPE-HPLC-UV | 60 | 3 | 30 | 4 | 2.7-4.5 % | 60-92% | [5] |
| G-CNT-Fe3O4 | MSPE/HPLC–UV | 80 | 4 | 15 | 4 to 8 | 3.9-8.8 | 75-102% | [62] |
| Fe3O4@SiO2-MWCNT | MSPE-LC-MS | 80 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 2.9-10.4% | 84-101% | This method |
n=number of analytes; AD=adsorbent dosage (mg), CT = contact time (min), % R =% recovery, and % RSD=% relative standard deviation.