Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug;26(8):284–290. doi: 10.1101/lm.049577.119

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Discriminative fear but not safety learning in a paradigm with tone/tone pair of the CSs. (A) Percentage of time spent freezing in trials with the 12 kHz CS− in the testing session with the conditioning context (day 4). No significant difference in the freezing level on average is found between the CS− and the PreCS−, indicating no apparent effect of the CS− on contextual fear in this paradigm. (B) Percentage of time spent freezing in trials with the 4 kHz CS+ on day 4. A significantly higher level of freezing is found for the CS+ compared to the PreCS+. (C) Comparison of the changes in freezing levels from the PreCS period to the CS period on day 4. A significant difference of the changes in freezing levels during the CSs indicates discriminatory responses to the tone CSs. (D) A positive change in the freezing level is found for the 4 kHz CS+ but not for the 12 kHz CS− in the testing session with a novel context (day 5), indicating cued fear selective to the 4 kHz CS+. Gray dots with lines (AC) and circles (D) represent the median of data sets from three trials for individual mice (n = 12 mice). All data in bar graphs are depicted as mean ± SEM. (***) P < 0.001. P values were obtained using a two-tailed paired t-test (AC) and a one-tailed paired t-test (D).