Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 25;147(12):2338–2346. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.255554

TABLE 2.

Dietary characteristics of the study treatments on days 1–61

NP-PLANT NP-BEEF HP-BEEF
Breakfast
 Energy content, kcal 354 ± 0 350 ± 0 350 ± 0
 Energy density, kcal/100 g 136 ± 8 140 ± 17 140 ± 6
 Total protein, g 13 ± 0 14 ± 0 35 ± 0
 Beef, g 0 ± 0 9 ± 0 27 ± 0
 Carbohydrate, g 48 ± 0 48 ± 0 36 ± 0
 Fat, g 12 ± 0 12 ± 0 9 ± 0
Lunch
 Energy content, kcal 340 ± 0 340 ± 0 360 ± 0
 Energy density, kcal/100 g 171 ± 18 173 ± 25 160 ± 14
 Total protein, g 13 ± 0 13 ± 0 35 ± 0
 Beef, g 0 ± 0 7 ± 0 22 ± 0
 Carbohydrate, g 48 ± 0 48 ± 0 35 ± 0
 Fat, g 12 ± 0 12 ± 0 8 ± 0
Dinner
 Energy content, kcal 340 ± 0 330 ± 0 360 ± 0
 Energy density, kcal/100 g 149 ± 22 133 ± 14 145 ± 9
 Total protein, g 13 ± 0 13 ± 0 35 ± 0
 Beef, g 0 ± 0 7 ± 0 30 ± 0
 Carbohydrate, g 48 ± 0 48 ± 0 34 ± 0
 Fat, g 12 ± 0 12 ± 0 10 ± 0
Evening snack
 Energy content, kcal 200 ± 0 210 ± 0 210 ± 10
 Energy density, kcal/100 g 165 ± 3 189 ± 36 147 ± 6
 Total protein, g 8 ± 0 8 ± 0 19 ± 0
 Beef, g 0 ± 0 4 ± 0 16 ± 0
 Carbohydrate, g 28 ± 0 28 ± 0 20 ± 0
 Fat, g 7 ± 0 7 ± 0 6 ± 0
Daily intake
 Energy content, kcal 1220 ± 0 1240 ± 0 1280 ± 10
 Energy density, kcal/100 g 148 ± 9 144 ± 5 146 ± 7
 Total protein, g 47 ± 0 48 ± 0 124 ± 0
 Beef, g 0 ± 0 27 ± 0 95 ± 0
 Carbohydrate, g 171 ± 0 172 ± 0 125 ± 0
 Fat, g 42 ± 0 43 ± 0 33 ± 0
 Diet palatability, mm (rating category) 58 ± 3a (slight like) 72 ± 3b (slight like) 69 ± 4b (slight like)
1

Values are means ± SEMs, n = 17. Labeled means in a row without a common superscript letter differ, P < 0.0125. HP-BEEF, higher-protein beef diet (60% of protein from beef and 40% from plant sources); NP-BEEF, normal-protein diet (60% of protein from beef and 40% from plant sources); NP-PLANT, normal-protein plant diet (100% of protein from plant sources).