Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 10;10:1547. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01547

TABLE 5.

Comparison of the relative abundance (%) of the representative bacteriaN at the genus level in the abomasum of the five breeds.

Abomasum Dairy cattle Yellow cattle WQ yak SZ yak ZB yak SEM P
Acetobacter 0.24 0.02 0.10 1.79 2.68 0.52 0.429
Butyrivibrio 2 1.56cd 1.18bc 1.89d 0.47a 0.55ab 0.15 0.000
Christensenellaceae R7 3.19a 5.79ab 3.53a 12.30b 7.29ab 1.07 0.015
Fibrobacter 2.26b 2.74b 2.35b 0.01a 0.65a 0.40 0.001
Lachnospiraceae UCG008 0.14a 0.20a 0.45a 2.08b 1.68ab 0.25 0.005
Mycoplasma 0.30a 0.02a 0.63a 4.49b 8.85b 1.71 0.004
Papillibacter 0.59 1.92 0.68 1.27 1.21 0.21 0.319
Prevotella 23.99b 6.11ab 18.38ab 1.39a 5.57ab 2.79 0.016
Prevotellaceae UCG001 2.75 1.01 4.40 3.62 6.50 0.90 0.452
Prevotellaceae UCG003 1.13 1.19 1.52 0.14 2.01 0.37 0.679
Rikenellaceae RC9 10.23 9.77 7.85 16.40 12.32 1.24 0.246
Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 5.18 6.10 2.89 8.54 4.04 0.75 0.142
Ruminococcaceae UCG005 0.81a 4.14b 1.14a 3.53ab 1.67ab 0.42 0.012
Ruminococcus 1 1.38 2.13 1.68 1.08 3.84 0.54 0.592
Saccharofermentans 0.57 0.88 1.12 1.07 0.60 0.10 0.365
Succiniclasticum 4.50b 1.86b 7.91b 1.25a 0.65a 1.45 0.553
Eubacterium coprostanoligenes 0.54a 3.01bc 0.94ab 3.36c 1.45abc 0.35 0.009

Means within the same row with different letters are significantly different from one another. N, the method of selecting the representative bacteria at the genus level is described in Section “Bioinformatics and Statistical Analyses.”