Table 2. Field feedback report.
| Scoring Criteria | % Feedback Report | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Login | Scanning | Upload | Number of Trials | Internet connectivity | |
| VE | 61.5± 18.3 | 34.6± 18.7 | 30.8± 17.8 | - | - |
| E | 38.5± 18.7 | 53.8± 19.2 | 43.6± 19.1 | - | - |
| G | - | - | - | - | 61.5± 18.3 |
| F | - | - | - | 30.8± 17.8 | |
| D | - | - | 20.5± 15.5 | - | - |
| V | - | - | - | - | - |
| P | - | - | - | - | 7.7 ± 10.3 |
| CS | - | 3.8± 7.4 | - | - | |
| CU | - | - | 5.1± 8.5 | - | - |
| NE | - | 7.7 ± 10.3 | - | - | - |
| 1 | - | - | 61.5± 18.3 | - | |
| 2 | - | - | 17.3± 14.5 | - | |
| 3 | - | - | 13.4± 13.1 | - | |
| ≥4 | - | - | 3.8 ±7.4 | - | |
Key: Very easy (VE), easy (E), good (G), fair (F), difficult (D), Varies (V), poor (P), couldn’t upload (CU), couldn’t scan (CS), and not easy (NE)
Twenty six feedback reports were received and used in the analysis.