Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 17;9:10358. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46775-8

Table 2.

Mean and SEM of sperm quality attributes (sperm membranes integrity and function, production of ROS, lipid peroxidation and DNA fragmentation) evaluated in the selected commercial semen batches.

Sperm quality analyses of the selected batches Fertility groups
HFa (n = 3) LFb (n = 3)
Sperm membranes integrity, mitochondrial membrane function and ROS production by fluorescence microscopy
PIAIHc (%) 48.9 ± 4.7 45.2 ± 6.1
Plasma membrane integrity (%) 51.5 ± 5.1 48.5 ± 6.4
Acrosome membrane integrity (%) 60.7 ± 3.6 59.4 ± 4.1
High mitochondrial membrane potential (%) 62.6 ± 7.9 54.7 ± 7.2
ROSd (%) 5.2 ± 0.9 10.7 ± 4.9
Sperm membranes integrity, mitochondrial membrane function, ROS production, lipid peroxidation and DNA fragmentation by flow cytometry
Plasma membrane integrity (%) 49.5 ± 0.3 45.6 ± 8.2
Acrosome membrane integrity (%) 83.9 ± 2.3 78.3 ± 3.7
Plasma and acrosome membrane integrity (%) 49.3 ± 0.3 45.4 ± 8.3
Plasma membrane integrity and high mitochondrial membrane potential (%) 24.4 ± 2.1 26.3 ± 2.9
Plasma membrane integrity and mitochondrial positive ROS (%) 5.3 ± 1.6 4.1 ± 1.0
Mitochondrial positive ROS (ua) 621.0 ± 76.2 678.3 ± 23.5
Lipid peroxidation (ua) 2,502.0 ± 395.6 2,764.9 ± 921.8
DNA fragmentation (%) 5.8 ± 0.1 5.7 ± 0.1

Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05. aHigh fertility; bLow fertility; cSperm with plasma and acrosome membrane integrity and high mitochondrial potential; dProduction of ROS (reactive oxygen species). SEM: standard error of the mean.