Table 1.
Site | Samples analyses | Survey periods | Juvenile1 | NP female | Pregnant female | AF | AM | Total adults | Total FP/site |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL | Hematology | 2009–2017 | 42 | 13 | 19 | 32 | 35 | 67 | 109 |
TZO | Hematology | 2002–2015 | 28 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 58 | 81 | 79 |
Total FP/group | 70 | 24 | 31 | 55 | 93 | 148 | 188 | ||
PL | Serum Chemistry | 2009–2017 | 41 | 0 | 24 | 24 | 32 | 56 | 97 |
TZO | Serum Chemistry | 2002–2015 | 15 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 40 | 53 | 68 |
Total FP/group | 56 | 4 | 33 | 37 | 72 | 109 | 165 |
1JFs < 130 cm in total length. JMs < 138 cm in total length. Within hematology data, Fisher’s exact test indicated that when data were combined across both locations, no differences were detected in sample distribution between age group (adults and juvenile) and sex (P = 1.0) or between age group and location (P = 0.06). However, significant differences were detected in numbers of AM and female samples between locations (P = 0.017). This difference did not exist (P = 0.17) when samples collected from only adult NP females and AMs compared between locations were examined. For serum chemistry data, overall no differences in frequency of sampling of adults and juvenile across each sex were detected (P = 0.727). However, when pregnant females were excluded, the distribution was different (P < 0.001). Finally, no differences were detected in the frequency of AMs and all AFs (P = 0.07) or AMs and NP (P = 0.134) females across locations.