Table 2.
Study | Location | Setting | Patient Selection | Study Design | Intervention Description | Outcome(s) measured | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Krishna (2017)31 | Birmingham, United Kingdom | Large teaching hospital | Adult patients that are not unconscious and without altered mental status | Development and conceptual framework | Electronic guideline including an e-questionnaire about the allergy history and host factors and answers that interfaces with computerized decision support system (“CDSS,” electronic software that guides the risk stratification into high or low risk). Low risk patients undergo a direct 250 mg amoxicillin challenge | Not applicable | |
Trubiano (2018)29 | Melbourne, Australia | 1 referral cancer hospital and 1 academic medical center | Adult patients with penicillin allergy labels including a cohort with cancer | Pre/Post of 46 patients including 10 inpatients with cancer and 19 inpatients without cancer, all with low-risk penicillin allergy | Allergy history-based guidance for oral penicillin re-challenge program | Alternative ABX use | Restricted ABX 90 days pre/post decreased from 55% to 23% |
BL use | Penicillin use 90 days pre/post was increased from 23% to 77% | ||||||
Safety | There were no ADRs |
Abbreviations: ABX, antibiotic; BL, beta-lactam; ADR, adverse drug reaction