Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 16;26(1):97–105. doi: 10.1111/acem.13520

Table 1.

Summary of High-priority Research and Policy Recommendations, With Examples of Solutions and Potential Pitfalls to Implementation or Adoption

Recommendation Examples Pitfalls
1. Develop improved methods for cross-platform identification and linkage of patients Global unique identifier (GUID) Security/privacy
2. Create central, deidentified, open access databases NIH -omics repositories Unfunded mandates, system maintenance
3. Improve methodologies for visualization and analysis of intensively sampled data Continuous telemetry, fitness trackers File size, data storage, proprietary restrictions
4. Develop methods to identify and standardize electronic medical record data quality Identification of template overuse, prevention of illogical data entry Evolving, unreliable history
5. Improve and utilize natural language processing Leverage richness of natural language over discrete data fields Clinician level and regional variations
6. Develop and utilize syndrome or complaint-based based taxonomies of disease Chest pain rather than gastroesophageal reflux disease Billing tied to diagnosis codes
7. Develop a practical and ethical framework to leverage electronic systems for controlled trials Patient level or site clustered randomization Overreliance on statistical modeling and inference
8. Explore technologies to help enable clinical trials in the emergency setting National database of preencounter consent Practical framework, time sensitivity
9. Train emergency care clinicians in data science and data scientists in emergency care medicine K08, K23, and K24 mechanisms Dissociation of clinical practicalities from data analysis