Table 2.
Gene ID (Phytozome) | log2 fold change (Xcc306ΔpthA4::dCsLOB4 vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4) | log2 fold change (Xcc306WT vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4) | log2 fold change (Xcc306ΔpthA4::dCsLOB2 vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4) | log2 fold change (Xcc306ΔpthA4::dCsLOB3 vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4) |
---|---|---|---|---|
orange1.1g036782m | Infinite | |||
orange1.1g011687m | 5.7325 | |||
orange1.1g048531m | 3.8539 | |||
orange1.1g023962m | 3.6642 | 2.8367 | 2.9486 | 6.5571 |
orange1.1g040868m | 2.7413 | 2.7184 | 3.4253 | 6.2149 |
orange1.1g040244m | 2.4699 | 3.9254 | ||
orange1.1g034401m | 2.2665 | 1.8605 | 1.9224 | 4.3398 |
orange1.1g038146m | 2.2480 | 2.6675 | 2.5362 | 4.7505 |
orange1.1g007426m | 2.1797 | 0.7902 | 4.7797 | |
orange1.1g044553m | 2.0393 | 1.3147 | 2.2238 |
Blank cells indicate that the differential expression levels are not significant at a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05.
Infinite denotes that the fold change is positive infinite. The table is a derivative from the RNA‐Seq analysis.