Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 11;18(6):798–810. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12441

Table 2.

Genes whose log2 fold changes are greater than two in a comparison between Xcc306ΔpthA4::dCsLOB4 and Xcc306ΔpthA4, and the differential expression levels in three other comparisons: Xcc306WT vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4, Xcc306ΔpthA4::dCsLOB2 vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4, and Xcc306ΔpthA4::dCsLOB3 vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4.

Gene ID (Phytozome) log2 fold change (Xcc306ΔpthA4::dCsLOB4 vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4) log2 fold change (Xcc306WT vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4) log2 fold change (Xcc306ΔpthA4::dCsLOB2 vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4) log2 fold change (Xcc306ΔpthA4::dCsLOB3 vs. Xcc306ΔpthA4)
orange1.1g036782m Infinite
orange1.1g011687m 5.7325
orange1.1g048531m 3.8539
orange1.1g023962m 3.6642 2.8367 2.9486 6.5571
orange1.1g040868m 2.7413 2.7184 3.4253 6.2149
orange1.1g040244m 2.4699 3.9254
orange1.1g034401m 2.2665 1.8605 1.9224 4.3398
orange1.1g038146m 2.2480 2.6675 2.5362 4.7505
orange1.1g007426m 2.1797 0.7902 4.7797
orange1.1g044553m 2.0393 1.3147 2.2238

Blank cells indicate that the differential expression levels are not significant at a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05.

Infinite denotes that the fold change is positive infinite. The table is a derivative from the RNA‐Seq analysis.