. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0220014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220014

Table 6. Log-logistic model parameters estimates and standard errors for Palmer amaranth biomass reduction as influenced by downwind distance for each nozzle*herbicide combinations tested in the spray particle drift study^a ^b.

Nozzle^c	Herbicide	Log-logistic model parameters^d
Nozzle^c	Herbicide	b	d (%)	e (m)
TP95015EVS	Glyphosate	2.55 ± 0.83	93.13 ± 1.92	16.31 ± 2.24
	2,4-D	0.86 ± 0.14	84.76 ± 3.55	10.91 ± 1.98
	Dicamba	0.91 ± 0.14	95.59 ± 3.75	11.50 ± 1.82
AI95015EVS	Glyphosate	1.53 ± 0.19	98.28 ± 3.09	7.55 ± 0.63
	2,4-D	0.46 ± 0.10	85.85 ± 4.27	5.38 ± 1.53
	Dicamba	0.37 ± 0.09	90.98 ± 4.28	5.37 ± 1.80

^aGlyphosate solution had the addition of ammonium sulfate solution at 5% v/v (Bronc^®, Wilbur-Ellis Agribusiness, Aurora, CO, USA).

^bBiomass reduction as compared to the untreated control.

^cTeeJet Technologies, Spraying Systems Co., Glendale Heights, IL.

^dc parameter (lower limit) fixed to 0%; b parameter corresponds to the slope at the inflection point; d parameter corresponds to the upper limit, e parameter corresponds to the distance to 50% biomass reduction; D₅ corresponds to the distance with 5% application rate deposition.

Table 6. Log-logistic model parameters estimates and standard errors for Palmer amaranth biomass reduction as influenced by downwind distance for each nozzle*herbicide combinations tested in the spray particle drift studyab.

Table 6. Log-logistic model parameters estimates and standard errors for Palmer amaranth biomass reduction as influenced by downwind distance for each nozzle*herbicide combinations tested in the spray particle drift study^a ^b.