Table 5. Multivariate analyses of factors associated with property crime and personal crime.
Step 1 | Step 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
β (SE) | Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
β (SE) | Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
|
Property crime1 | ||||
Perpetrator yes | 1.04 (0.54) | 2.82 (0.98–8.08)*! | 1.07 (0.54) | 2.93 (1.02–8.41)* |
HoNOS behavior | 0.56 (0.29) | 1.76 (0.99–3.12) | 0.59 (0.29) | 1.80 (1.01–3.21)* |
MANSA | -0.51 (0.18) | 0.60 (0.42–0.85)** | -0.52 (0.18) | 0.59 (0.42–0.84)** |
Age 36–45 | 0.43 (0.33) | 1.53 (0.80–2.94) | ||
Constant | 0.91 (0.92) | 2.47 | 1.08 (0.90) | 2.95 |
Personal crime2 | ||||
Perpetrator yes | 2.34 (0.58) | 10.41 (3.34–32.38)*** | ||
Age 25–35 | 1.63 (0.59) | 5.09 (1.62–16.00)** | ||
36–45 | 1.14 (0.49) | 3.13 (1.20–8.16)* | ||
Comorbid disorder yes | 1.08 (0.47) | 2.93 (1.24–6.95)* | ||
HoNOS behavior | 0.65 (0.37) | 2.02 (1.00–4.12)* | ||
Constant | -3.83 (0.47) | 0.02*** |
1Property crime
Step 1 Omnibus tests Step p <0.001, Model p <0.001, Hosmer and Lemeshow p 0.291, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.120
Step 2 Omnibus tests Step p 0.451, Model p <0.001, Hosmer and Lemeshow p 0.736, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.112
2Personal crime
Step 1 Omnibus tests Step p <0.001, Model p <0.001, Hosmer and Lemeshow p 0.116, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.243
*p ≤ 0.05
**p < 0.01
***p < 0.001