Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219056

Table 5. Multivariate analyses of factors associated with property crime and personal crime.

Step 1 Step 2
β (SE) Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
β (SE) Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
Property crime1
Perpetrator yes 1.04 (0.54) 2.82 (0.98–8.08)*! 1.07 (0.54) 2.93 (1.02–8.41)*
HoNOS behavior 0.56 (0.29) 1.76 (0.99–3.12) 0.59 (0.29) 1.80 (1.01–3.21)*
MANSA -0.51 (0.18) 0.60 (0.42–0.85)** -0.52 (0.18) 0.59 (0.42–0.84)**
Age 36–45 0.43 (0.33) 1.53 (0.80–2.94)
Constant 0.91 (0.92) 2.47 1.08 (0.90) 2.95
Personal crime2
Perpetrator yes 2.34 (0.58) 10.41 (3.34–32.38)***
Age        25–35 1.63 (0.59) 5.09 (1.62–16.00)**
                36–45 1.14 (0.49) 3.13 (1.20–8.16)*
Comorbid disorder yes 1.08 (0.47) 2.93 (1.24–6.95)*
HoNOS behavior 0.65 (0.37) 2.02 (1.00–4.12)*
Constant -3.83 (0.47) 0.02***

1Property crime

Step 1 Omnibus tests Step p <0.001, Model p <0.001, Hosmer and Lemeshow p 0.291, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.120

Step 2 Omnibus tests Step p 0.451, Model p <0.001, Hosmer and Lemeshow p 0.736, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.112

2Personal crime

Step 1 Omnibus tests Step p <0.001, Model p <0.001, Hosmer and Lemeshow p 0.116, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.243

*p ≤ 0.05

**p < 0.01

***p < 0.001