Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219118

Table 3. Clinical outcomes, nutritional status, and food insecurity among participants who received RUTF versus the food basket.

All subjects RUTF Food basket p-value
Sputum smear positivea, n (%)
    M0 19 (73.1) 10 (83.3) 9 (64.3) 0.54
    M6 0 0 0 -
CD4, median (IQR)
    M0 207 (127–313) 242 (130–403) 195 (107–285) 0.70
    M6 321 (144–419) 326 (216–487) 266 (125–402) 0.66
Hb (g/dl), median (IQR)
    M0 10.15 (8.00–11.95) 8.45 (7.90–11.70) 10.50 (8.98–12.18) 0.24
    M6 12.75 (11.73–14.00) 11.55 (10.68–12.98) 13.55 (12.55–14.38) 0.18
Weight (kg), median (IQR)
    M0 50.00 (44.50–55.00) 47.00 (42.25–55.00) 50.50 (45.00–55.00) 0.45
    M6 55.00 (47.00–61.38) 54.50 (45.50–61.63) 55.50 (50.00–62.75) 0.71
BMI, median (IQR)
    M0 17.33 (15.98–20.20) 16.76 (15.71–20.20) 18.31 (15.98–19.88) 0.70
    M6 19.26 (17.44–23.01) 19.26 (18.11–22.54) 19.12 (17.14–23.39) 1.00
Malnourished, n (%)
    M0 15 (57.7) 8 (66.7) 7 (50.0) 0.39
    M6 9 (34.6) 4 (33.3) 5 (35.7) 1.00
Food insecure, n (%)
    M0 24 (92.3) 11 (91.7) 13 (92.9) 1.00
    M6 19 (73.1) 8 (66.7) 11 (78.6) 0.67
Severely food insecure, n (%)
    M0 12 (46.2) 7 (58.3) 5 (35.7) 0.25
    M6 5 (19.2) 2 (16.7) 3 (21.4) 1.00