Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Invest New Drugs. 2018 Jul 7;36(6):1060–1071. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0625-6

Table 3.

Best overall response in the dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts

Dose-escalation cohorts
Central Reada
Tumor Response, 1, 2, 4, 8 mg 16 mg 24 mg 25 mg 30 mg 30 mg + G-CSF 35 mg + G-CSF 40 mg + G-CSF 50 mg + G-CSF
 Patients (%)  (n = 4)  (n = 3)  (n = 6)  (n = 7)  (n = 6)  (n = 6)  (n = 3)  (n = 11)  (n = 4)
Complete response 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Partial response 0 0 0 0 1 (17)b 0 0 0 0
Stable disease 2 (50) 2 (67) 5 (83) 4 (57) 3 (50) 3 (50) 1 (33) 7 (64) 2 (50)
Progressive disease 2 (50) 0 1 (17) 1 (14) 1 (17) 3 (50) 2 (67) 2 (18) 0
Unable to evaluate 0 1 (33) 0 2 (29) 1 (17) 0 0 2 (18) 2 (50)
Dose-expansion cohorts
Central Reada Local Readc GCIG Criteriad
Tumor Response, OC TNBC CRPC OC TNBC CRPC OC
 Patients (%)  (n = 29)  (n = 14)  (n = 12)  (n = 29)  (n = 14)  (n = 12)  (n = 29)
Complete response 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Partial response 3 (10) 0 0 3 (10) 1 (7) 0 7 (24)
Stable disease 21 (72) 7 (50) 9 (75) 20 (69) 5 (36) 8 (67) 16 (55)
Progressive disease 3 (10) 4 (29) 1 (8) 4 (14) 5 (36) 3 (25) 3 (10)
Not evaluablee 2 (7) 3 (21) 2 (17) 2 (7) 3 (21) 1 (8) 3 (10)
Progression-free survival, median (80% CI), weeks 31.7 (23.7–47.6) 7.6 (4.1–23.6) 32.4 (15.7–39.6) NA NA NA NA

CRPC castration-resistant prostate cancer, GCIG Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup, G-CSF granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, NA not available, OC ovarian cancer, RECIST response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer

a

Per RECIST 1.1

b

This patient also had a response by GCIG CA 125 criteria

c

Per RECIST 1.0

d

Per GCIG criteria: RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 [22]

e

Postbaseline scan not readable