Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 5;51(3):1086–1097. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.537

Table 3.

Prognostic impact of PD-L1 upregulation (versus no change or downregulation) following platinum-based NACT

Model Disease-free survival
Overall survival
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
Model 1a) 1.17 (0.67-2.03) 0.578 1.69 (0.89-3.22) 0.111
Model 2b) 1.32 (0.73-2.39) 0.366 1.60 (0.80-3.18) 0.182
Model 3c) 0.89 (0.46-1.70) 0.718 1.53 (0.69-3.38) 0.290

PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; NACT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a)

Model 1 is adjusted for age (≥ 65 vs. < 65), pretreatment clinical stage (I-II vs. III), and pathologic N category (ypN0 vs. ypN1 vs. ypN2 vs. ypN3),

b)

Model 2 is adjusted for age (≥ 65 vs. < 65), pretreatment clinical stage (I-II vs. III), pathologic N category (ypN0 vs. ypN1 vs. ypN2 vs. ypN3), and pre-NACT PD-L1 tumor proportion score (< 1% vs. 1%-50% vs. ≥ 50%),

c)

Model 3 is adjusted for age (≥ 65 vs. < 65), pretreatment clinical stage (I-II vs. III), pathologic N category (ypN0 vs. ypN1 vs. ypN2 vs. ypN3), and post-NACT PD-L1 tumor proportion score (< 1% vs. 1-50% vs. ≥ 50%).